I would second Igor's request especially since cutting the additional time has come in handy during changing HF conditions where the band could drop out quickly during a QSO. It may also have the secondary effect of eliminating some of the angst exhibited by some operators out there that I'm sure we've all seen in one place or another on the various social media platforms if it's included as an "official" part of the software.
73, Jim S. N2ADV > On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:15 AM, Игорь Ч <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Joe and all, > > I have checked statistics based on the All.txt file: at least every second > operator transmit manually generated message RR73 or 'RRR 73' instead of the > standard RRR message. File with the summary and raw data in MS Excel format > is located there: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4KBg/UoqJWw6rK > > Summary does not include scenario where some operators use 73 message instead > of the RRR one. > > There are three reasons to modify user interface with this message: > > 1. It should reduce spectrum usage and interference on the overcrowded HF > bands > 2. It will make GUI more user friendly one > 3. It will save time, both, in terms of the QSO length and manual message > generation > > Also possibility to activate prompt for QSO logging on the RR73 message would > benefit users. > > May I ask to consider the code change in some future release, please? > > 73 Igor UA3DJY > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
