resending the message, there may still be possibility to change standard QSO exchange sequence: > >Statistics showing different behaviour of users. > >I see there is restriction for RR73 as it is matching to the grid square. > >Just wondering: is there any obstacle to use R73 message instead of the RRR >one? > >73 Igor > >Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 8:24 -06:00 от Michael Black < [email protected] >: > >That's why education is important....if you look in the help file you'll find >the standard exchange. I know most people will never read that...so perhaps >we need some pop up the first time you send an RRR which is then suppressed >which says "FYI....RRR is the last message needed for the calling side of a JT >QSO...no 73 is needed...see help file" > >I got educated and quit using it. RRR Mike W9MDB > > >>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 16:51 +03:00 от Игорь Ч < [email protected] >: >> >>Hi Mike, >> >>That is exactly what happens: after the RRR message most users consider as >>polite way to send the 73 mesage. >> >>Alternative option could be R73. >> >>73 Igor >> >>Re: [wsjt-devel] RR73 message button >>From: Michael Black <mdblack98@gm...> - 2015-12-11 13:23:54 >>Attachments: Message as HTML >>We've gone through this discussion before...I used to think it was a good >>idea too. But...RR73 is a grid location...and RRR is the last message for >>the CQ side of the QSO...not 73. >>So you don't save any time by doing RR73 unless you would otherwise do an >>RRR followed by an unnecessary 73. >>It's just hard to drop the habit of using 73 like you use on every other >>protocol. >>RRR :-) >>Mike W9MDB >> >> >>>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 12:15 +03:00 от Игорь Ч < [email protected] >: >>> >>>Hi Joe and all, >>> >>>I have checked statistics based on the All.txt file: at least every second >>>operator transmit manually generated message RR73 or 'RRR 73' instead of the >>>standard RRR message. File with the summary and raw data in MS Excel format >>>is located there: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4KBg/UoqJWw6rK >>> >>>Summary does not include scenario where some operators use 73 message >>>instead of the RRR one. >>> >>>There are three reasons to modify user interface with this message: >>> >>>1. It should reduce spectrum usage and interference on the overcrowded HF >>>bands >>>2. It will make GUI more user friendly one >>>3. It will save time, both, in terms of the QSO length and manual message >>>generation >>> >>>Also possibility to activate prompt for QSO logging on the RR73 message >>>would benefit users. >>> >>>May I ask to consider the code change in some future release, please? >>> >>>73 Igor UA3DJY >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
