Statistics showing different behaviour of users. I see there is restriction for RR73 as it is matching to the grid square.
Just wondering: is there any obstacle to use R73 message instead of the RRR one? 73 Igor Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 8:24 -06:00 от Michael Black <[email protected]>: That's why education is important....if you look in the help file you'll find the standard exchange. I know most people will never read that...so perhaps we need some pop up the first time you send an RRR which is then suppressed which says "FYI....RRR is the last message needed for the calling side of a JT QSO...no 73 is needed...see help file" I got educated and quit using it. RRR Mike W9MDB >Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 16:51 +03:00 от Игорь Ч <[email protected]>: > >Hi Mike, > >That is exactly what happens: after the RRR message most users consider as >polite way to send the 73 mesage. > >Alternative option could be R73. > >73 Igor > >Re: [wsjt-devel] RR73 message button >From: Michael Black <mdblack98@gm...> - 2015-12-11 13:23:54 >Attachments: Message as HTML >We've gone through this discussion before...I used to think it was a good >idea too. But...RR73 is a grid location...and RRR is the last message for >the CQ side of the QSO...not 73. >So you don't save any time by doing RR73 unless you would otherwise do an >RRR followed by an unnecessary 73. >It's just hard to drop the habit of using 73 like you use on every other >protocol. >RRR :-) >Mike W9MDB > > >>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 12:15 +03:00 от Игорь Ч < [email protected] >: >> >>Hi Joe and all, >> >>I have checked statistics based on the All.txt file: at least every second >>operator transmit manually generated message RR73 or 'RRR 73' instead of the >>standard RRR message. File with the summary and raw data in MS Excel format >>is located there: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4KBg/UoqJWw6rK >> >>Summary does not include scenario where some operators use 73 message instead >>of the RRR one. >> >>There are three reasons to modify user interface with this message: >> >>1. It should reduce spectrum usage and interference on the overcrowded HF >>bands >>2. It will make GUI more user friendly one >>3. It will save time, both, in terms of the QSO length and manual message >>generation >> >>Also possibility to activate prompt for QSO logging on the RR73 message would >>benefit users. >> >>May I ask to consider the code change in some future release, please? >> >>73 Igor UA3DJY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
