Hi Mike, That is exactly what happens: after the RRR message most users consider as polite way to send the 73 mesage.
Alternative option could be R73. 73 Igor Re: [wsjt-devel] RR73 message button From: Michael Black <mdblack98@gm...> - 2015-12-11 13:23:54 Attachments: Message as HTML We've gone through this discussion before...I used to think it was a good idea too. But...RR73 is a grid location...and RRR is the last message for the CQ side of the QSO...not 73. So you don't save any time by doing RR73 unless you would otherwise do an RRR followed by an unnecessary 73. It's just hard to drop the habit of using 73 like you use on every other protocol. RRR :-) Mike W9MDB >Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 12:15 +03:00 от Игорь Ч <[email protected]>: > >Hi Joe and all, > >I have checked statistics based on the All.txt file: at least every second >operator transmit manually generated message RR73 or 'RRR 73' instead of the >standard RRR message. File with the summary and raw data in MS Excel format is >located there: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4KBg/UoqJWw6rK > >Summary does not include scenario where some operators use 73 message instead >of the RRR one. > >There are three reasons to modify user interface with this message: > >1. It should reduce spectrum usage and interference on the overcrowded HF bands >2. It will make GUI more user friendly one >3. It will save time, both, in terms of the QSO length and manual message >generation > >Also possibility to activate prompt for QSO logging on the RR73 message would >benefit users. > >May I ask to consider the code change in some future release, please? > >73 Igor UA3DJY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
