On 12/18/2015 4:07 PM, Michael Black wrote:
> I think the idea is that they want the "@" to remain. But if it's always
> "@NNNN" with N=frequency could JTAlert allow that through without
> substitution?
That's irrelevant. A message of the form "@nnnn" is for WSJT or WSJT-X
alone. There's no reason for JTAlert to be involved in any way.
JTAlert would not even be running in any situation involving "@nnnn".
-- Joe, K1JT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
