Understand. Then your idea makes much better sense. George J Molnar, CEM, CHPP @GJMolnar | KF2T | AFA9GM
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Bill Somerville <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 18/12/2015 18:42, Molnar, George J wrote: >> Is there a non-EME use case for JT65/9/4 for ST messages? >> >> Maybe just disable ST except when the EME delay checkbox is true? > Hi Geo, > > it's not quite as simple as that, the message content is checked deep in > the encoders. Currently there is no parameter at that level to determine > if short code are enabled, the '@' in position one does that. > > I would have thought that any weak signal propagation mode near limiting > minimum could use them so long as they are not in a crowded band. I've > no idea if they are used away from EME. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
