On 18/12/2015 18:56, Joe Taylor wrote: > I think we should allow @ in column 1 in any message box. For many > years this has been interpreted (in WSJT) as a request to transmit a > fixed tone at a specified frequency. > > Surely the need for "@" in other messages, especially in column 1, is > negligibly small.
Hi Joe, Given Charlie's comment about use of @2000 I tend to agree. I certainly didn't intend to remove something that is used by. I believe the issue may lay with JTAlert which uses macro characters to substitute names etc. in free text messages. If it is possible for JTAlert to leave in an '@' character then this may be best addressed there. I will leave well alone. 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
