Is there a non-EME use case for JT65/9/4 for ST messages? Maybe just disable ST except when the EME delay checkbox is true?
Geo/KF2T ------ Original Message ------ From: "Bill Somerville" <[email protected]> To: "WSJT software development" <[email protected]> Sent: 12/18/2015 10:29:00 AM Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: Valid message characters >Hi All, > >the JT mode messages have a limited character set which we enforce in >the line edits where messages can be entered or amended. > >Igor UA3DJY has pointed out that if an '@' character is at position 1 >in >a message it will be interpreted as a short code message and generate a >fixed tone transmission (applies to JT65, JT9 and JT4). > >To stop this happening accidentally I propose to change the input >validation such that an '@' character is not allowed in position 1. >This >is not foolproof as the input logic can be defeated is some rare edge >cases but it will make it very unlikely to happen accidentally. > >Any objections to this? > >73 >Bill >G4WJS. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >_______________________________________________ >wsjt-devel mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
