It's jtdx with t10
On Apr 4, 2018 8:41 AM, <char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Conrad
>
> Which version of WSJT-X are you referring to? There were some
> improvements made relatively recently to improve the waterfall visibility
> on very weak signals, which are in the beta release of 1.9.0.
>
> 73
>
> Charlie
>
> > I am a very active user of JT65 on EME. The visibility of weak sync
> > traces is very important. WSJT10 is outstanding in this respect and try
> > as I might I cannot get the same results from WSJT-X. Does anyone have
> > any settings that work as well? I am looking for a straight emulation if
> > possible. It is one of the things that makes me hang on to WSJT10 for
> EME.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Conrad PA5Y
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
