I’m confused. Why is CQ 77 helpful? Only people who are already on 77 bit mode will decode you. Am I missing something? I am just curious. It seem more useful to TX on 75 bits with something like “PSE USE 77BIT”
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:23 PM Al Pawlowski <k6...@almont.com> wrote: > I have used “CQ 77 …..” a few times for the same thing and it is not very > sticky also. In fact, even saved free text messages revert to the standard > after any attempt to answer a call. > > In addition, it appears double-clicking a received message with <CQ_XXX>, > which is what other non-standard CQ messages I’ve seen decode as (probably > my 77 also, will not initiate a return/answer sequence on double click - > you have to start one manually (type callsign, generate messages, select > TX1, enable tx). So, I only send a couple of the CQ 77 messages and > followed by a standard CQ, or CQ DX. > > > Al Pawlowski, K6AVP > Los Osos, CA USA > > > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:36:29 +1300 > From: "Gary Hinson" <g...@isect.com> > To: "'WSJT software development'" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [wsjt-devel] 2 more bug reports on RC5 > > ………. I've tried sending "CQ PLUS ZL2IFB RF80" and > little free text messages to give more of a clue that I'm using the new 77 > bit version . but I've noticed that the "PLUS" in my CQ message is not very > sticky…………. > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
