Thanks for the update Bill

I have no issue with options being configurable but as Alex put it - ’never 
touch a running system’ - tidy up coding to make it more robust yes but 
removing a feature IMO is same as altering a default - it no longer works the 
same.

Also as with Alex just deleted a chuck of this reply so the thread does not go 
down hill fast.

Expressed my point I hope some more consideration may be given if this sort of 
issue arrises in the future.

Tom
GM8MJV

> On 16 Feb 2021, at 10:32, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alex and Tom,
> 
> the Hamlib change was not a change of defaults, it was a removal of a feature 
> that apparently was causing issues. I asked that it not be removed and the 
> option offered was to make it a configuration option.
> 
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
> 
> On 16/02/2021 10:26, Alex Artieda, HB9DRI wrote:
>> Totally in agree with Tom
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I delete part of my previous email to avoid start arguments BUT in IT we 
>> always said “never touch a running system” and for programming also apply, 
>> why change the previous default for something doesn’t works? And create just 
>> problems?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> PTT and associated routines was working great up to WSJT-X 2.2.2, why change 
>> that?, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, for sure exist a valid 
>> reason by “the authors” but unfortunate this time maybe wrong.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Alex, HB9DRI
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: tom <t...@tkrh.co.uk> <mailto:t...@tkrh.co.uk> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 4:18 PM
>> To: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com> <mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com>; WSJT 
>> software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
>> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] BUG in WSJT-X 2.3 and 2.4rc1 COM port
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi All
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Don’t want to start an argument and please feel free to ignore my comments.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> It seems a LOT of the errors recently seem to be because HamLib have altered 
>> defaults and others have to pick up the flack.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> It always used to be the case ’never alter the default’ - yes add new 
>> features but never change the default.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> There has been the issue of powering rigs on - default changed, shared ptt - 
>> default changed.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> There are more than a ‘couple of complains’ on this mailing list alone to 
>> keep the status quo.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Please Please Please DO NOT start to toss the blame around - oh it up to xyz 
>> to change their software to over-ride the changes we made.  Just keep 
>> defaults as they were and all will be happy.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> End of rant
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> GM8MJV
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On 16 Feb 2021, at 04:54, Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
>> <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> A couple of complaints from those who were using a single instance were 
>> having problems with the constant open/close of the serial port.
>> 
>> So it was changed to support the simple case and those that want the more 
>> complex case of multiple apps have to use the additional file as WSJT-X 
>> authors have decided to not include any options in the rig control user 
>> interface.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I'm looking at the sharing now to see if there is a problem going on.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Mike W9MDB
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Monday, February 15, 2021, 10:33:13 PM CST, Alex Artieda, HB9DRI 
>> <hb9...@emeham.com <mailto:hb9...@emeham.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hello Bill
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Following your instructions I use your file  (looks the same as I use 
>> before) and I place in the properly log directory for each of the WSJT-X 
>> (totally 4) and doesn’t work, the PTT is not share.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I wonder why if in WSJT-X 2.2.2 the PTT com port was share by default now is 
>> not?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Alex, HB9DRI
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com <mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>> 
>> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 6:29 PM
>> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FW: BUG in WSJT-X 2.3 and 2.4rc1 COM port
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> try the attached file. It needs to go in the log files directory of each 
>> WSJT-X instance ("Settings->File->Open log directory").
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 73
>> Bill
>> G4WJS.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On 15/02/2021 05:41, Alex Artieda, HB9DRI wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Mike
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Sorry I didn’t answer to the list;
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I create a file named hamlib_settings.json and paste inside the code you 
>> send me:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> {
>> 
>>      "config": {
>> 
>>             "ptt_share": 1
>> 
>>      }
>> 
>> }
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Then place this file in C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\WSJT-X and in
>> 
>> Each of the 4 WSJT-X folders but doesn’t work,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Alex, HB9DRI
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
>> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
>> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 11:11 AM
>> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Cc: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com> <mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FW: BUG in WSJT-X 2.3 and 2.4rc1 COM port
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The PTT port is no longer shareable by default.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Place this file in C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\WSJT-X
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> {
>> 
>>      "config": {
>> 
>>             "ptt_share": 1
>> 
>>      }
>> 
>> }
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Mike W9MDB
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Sunday, February 14, 2021, 07:43:47 PM CST, Alex Artieda, HB9DRI 
>> <hb9...@emeham.com <mailto:hb9...@emeham.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Just to inform you, I found a bug regarding COM port for PTT, it appears in 
>> WSJT-X 2.3 and in 2.4 RC1, let me explain.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I run 4 WSJT-X at the same time, I use Omnirig to control my IC9700 but PTT 
>> is manage via a COM port, this is a must for me to TX first a Sequencer via 
>> the COM port and later TX the radio, I cannot use CAT for PTT,  that 
>> guarantee me no RF spikes etc. 4 WSJT-X plus MAP65 plus WSJT10 are all 
>> configure to use COM3 for PTT, in this configuration I can TX with ANY of 
>> the 6 programs, more precise I can TX with the program were the decodes or 
>> best decode happens, unfortunate since WSJT-X 2.3 and 2.4RC1 I can TX ONLY 
>> with the FIRST program who opens the PTT COM port, the other ones don’t work 
>> and MAP65 give a opening COM port ERROR, the other WSJT-X simple don’t TX, 
>> would be great to fix this bug because when you run multiple WSJT-X is a 
>> must to work with all instance capable of TX, WSJT-X 2.2.2 works perfect.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> To confirm this bug I roll back to 2.2.2 and install 2.3 and later 2.4RC1, 
>> the bug appear in 2.3
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 73 de Alex, HB9DRI
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to