> On Oct 21, 2023, at 16:04, Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel > <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > If I am working a very weak station, and that station chooses to use RR73 > instead of 73, there > is a good chance that I have not received it, especially if I am waiting for > a qsb peak on the signal.
And that’s why RR73 isn’t supposed to be used on weak signal work. Specifically, RR73 is for use when a repeat transmission will not be called for. QSB should obviously negate that thought. That said, I sometimes send RR73 when I don’t mean to because I moved off of a stable band to one that is questionable and don’t realize it (not think to check it). It only happens once, as I noticed it immediately and make the change before the next contact. 73, Gary _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
