Huh?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel 
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 10/21/23  7:06 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andy Durbin <a.dur...@msn.com> Subject: 
Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? 

After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use of 
F/H mode.  I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto sequenced after 
RR73 was received.




I'll need to be careful to ensure TX5 is set correctly when in QSO. 




73,

Andy, k3wyc














From: Andy Durbin
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2023 12:14 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: No 73 allowed after RR73?
 


<!--
p
        {margin-top:0;
        margin-bottom:0}
-->



WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.




I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73 
after I had received an RR73.  This is expected operation with F/H active but 
not when F/H is not active.  I suspect that something is latched in software if 
F/H mode has been used
 but is then exited and WSJT-X is not re-started.




Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation?




73,

Andy, k3wyc



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to