If you don't print the RR73,  then repeat your QSL/exchange message.  If you 
never receive the RR73, then don't log the QSO.   How many times you repeat 
your QSL/exchange message is a judgment call.  It's a tradeoff between 
completing the QSO and moving on to the next one.73,Ed W0YK
-------- Original message --------From: Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel 
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 10/21/23  15:08  (GMT-08:00) To: Neil 
Zampella via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Andrew Neumeier 
<ka2...@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? 
        In some cases the use of RR73 is problematic.  I operate FT8 almost 
exclusively on 2 meters, weak signal.  If I am working a very weak station, and 
that station chooses to use RR73 instead of 73, thereis a good chance that I 
have not received it, especially if I am waiting for a qsb peak on the signal.  
By sending RR73 that station assumes we are done once RR73 is sent, but we may 
not be done.  I continuesending a signal report, while the station I was in 
contact with is off working another station.  I may then fail to log that qso, 
since it is incomplete, unless the station realizes the mistake and continues 
the qso.   On occasion I have even seen RR73 used in MSK144 or even Q65 which 
is just out of line in weak signal, or meteor scatter work.  When working weak 
signals I don't think RR73 should ever be used and I never use it myself.  
73,Andy, ka2uqw
        
        
            
                
                
                    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 04:53:15 PM EDT, Neil 
Zampella via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
                
                
                
                
    FWIW ... if you received an RR73 .. there is no need to reply.  
      
      
      The station is saying that RR I got your last, and 'over and out'
      ...  
      
      The other party is not waiting for your reply, they're on to
      another contact.
      
      Neil, KN3ILZ
      
      
    
    On 10/21/2023 1:14 PM, Andy Durbin
      wrote:
    
    
      
        WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.
      
        
      
      
        I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by
        sending 73 after I had received an RR73.  This is expected
        operation with F/H active but not when F/H is not active.  I
        suspect that something is latched in software if F/H mode has
        been used but is then exited and WSJT-X is not re-started.
      
        
      
      
        Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation?
      
        
      
      
        73,
      
        Andy, k3wyc
    
  _______________________________________________wsjt-devel mailing 
listwsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
            
        
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to