Good idea in general, but the JPEG2000 image is grayscale without any transparency and if I'm not entirely mistaken transparency isn't supported by JPEG2000. (at least I haven't seen it anywhere yet...)
But keep coming with the ideas :) Turbo Am 29.12.2010 03:03, schrieb Folken: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:26:40AM +0100, Tobias Bieniek wrote: >> Well... I'll try to describe the problem as easy as possible... > <snip - very intersting description of issue> >> So much for the problem, now some possible solutions: > Another proposal: > Use alpha channels and transparency. Define the -32XXX Value as > transparent. That info should not get lost and not be compressed unless > you flatten the layers. That way you would still get the advantage of > compression. > > Just something that could be explored. > > - Folken > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers > to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, > should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database > without downtime or disruption > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Xcsoar-user mailing list > Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
