Daniel Stone <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 12. Apr. 2017 um 18:58 Uhr:
> Hi Philipp, > hi! > Is the enforcement section your primary problem with the CC, and > how specifically (in terms of actual language used - or not used) do > you see Rust's CoC as improving on this? […] I *don't* read it as an > assumption that every report must result in action being taken against the > accused, no matter what. it specifically mentions the actions taken (warning → kick → ban), including the possibility to appeal. it doesn’t use threatening language to announce “repercussions” for project leaders. i think the way it’s written is less aggressive and leaves more room for forgiveness. for me, the CC sounds like immediate harsh punishment for even ignorance-caused transgressions is a *possibility*. Like in a bank, if you say the wrong word, the shutters go down, the sirens activate, and the police is called. rust’s CoC sounds like it was written by and for people you can talk to. Thanks a lot! > > Cheers, > Daniel > NP, thanks for caring about the community! Cheers!
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
