Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> > > With that change, first tests look fine.
> > Thanks, attached the patch with this error corrected.
> > > BTW, on the SA, what results do you get from xeno-test?
> > latency in user-space easily get above 100 microseconds, if this is what
> > you mean. But I guess this is what we should expect on ARM.
> Probably yes. The histogram just looks a bit strange, nearly
> all in the last column...
> Another point: did you run the switchbench test?
> With '-n 100000' I get a sure softlock.
Probably the default sampling period of 100 us is too hard for ARM,
Xenomai never gets out of the timer interrupt handler, you should try
and pass -p 1000.
Xenomai-core mailing list