Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> So, Ok, I will try to do something for x86 (either reduce the numbers of >> registers used by the C code, or reduce the assembly to the bare >> minimum). But, please, pick my generic implementation of llmulshft, it >> was carefully written. > > Yes, it is the better choice for 32 bit archs (my previous tests didn't > reflect the usage in Xenomai truely, redoing them made my generic > version fall behind yours). Will include it.
Done, see -v6. Then I added that two-liner for x86_64 rthal_llmulshft, fixed the BITS_PER_LONG bug, and enabled generic-based support for ARM (testing welcome!). At this chance: My series now also includes rthal_llimd for x86_64, another two-liner. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
