On 04/10/2012 02:33 PM, Roberto Bielli wrote: > Il 10/04/2012 13:49, Gilles Chanteperdrix ha scritto: >> On 04/10/2012 12:39 PM, Roberto Bielli wrote: >>> Hi Gilles, >>> >>> i tried your code but th behavior is the same. >>> >>> Then i tried a linux base app and works correctly. >> In the exact same conditions? With the crunching task running with >> SCHED_FIFO, priority 1, and the periodic task running with SCHED_FIFO, >> priority 99, and the linux real-time throttling disabled? >> > Yes, and i see that every LATCH ( about ~10ms ) period the task with > higher priority is wakeup. > So a task with lower priority is interrupted by timer interrupt and > reschedule the task with higher priority. > You need CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS to be in the same case as xenomai.
-- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core