Well .. I've got too much work to get done to play with it anymore. I've
burned half the day on this .. lol 

I just grabbed that 15" Sony and I'll have to figure it out laters.

Thanks for everyones help!

Rick


On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 11:55, Trever Furnish wrote:
> I wish I could help - maybe then I could help myself.  I have a system 
> with similar symptoms.  I've even explicitely set the hsync and vsync - 
> ie I put in only one value for each, not a range - and it doesn't seem 
> to help.  On the other hand, xvidtune claims it's not actually running 
> at exactly the freqs I entered still, so I guess it could still be a 
> sync rate problem.
> 
> The same monitor works great when being driven by windows.  In my case 
> I'm using different systems for linux and windows, so it could be a 
> video card thing, but the card worked fine before I switched the system 
> to linux.
> 
> The effect I have is one where there's almost a shadow image overlaid on 
> the real image - you can't really see it unless you look at an "edge" 
> where the intensity of the picture changes - for example, the transition 
> from a light desktop background to a dark xterm window.  About 3 
> millimeters from the edge, you see a phantom edge where everything is a 
> little lighter.  It's sort of like someone took a screenshot in the 
> gimp, duplicated the original layer, then moved the new layer a few 
> pixels to the right overlaid it on the using one of the methods that 
> only affects signal intensity.
> 
> FWIW, I've had the same problem several times in the past and have 
> always wanted to discover the fix, but so far no luck...
> 
> --
> Trever
> 
> D. Rick Anderson wrote:
> 
> >Man I wish it was something as simple as anti-aliasing.
> >
> >I tried my little 15" Sony on here, and it looks nice and sharp. I just
> >don't really want to work on that 15" all day.
> >
> >What's getting my goat is if I boot into windows 2000 it looks great!
> >It's only in linux that it looks like this, which is what led me to
> >think that it had to be a refresh problem or something. I know that
> >Shamrock made really cheap monitors, but I really don't have the money
> >to fork out for another 19", and besides, if it's working in Microshaft
> >Windblows then there must be a way to get it to work in X. 
> >
> >I ran ddcprobe and the values I got were:
> >H: 30 - 95
> >V: 47 - 130
> >
> >so that's what I set it to in the configuration, but it didn't change
> >anything.
> >
> >Thanks for your reply, I'll keep tinkering.
> >
> >Rick
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 11:13, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>On 10 Mar 2003, D. Rick Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>I'm having a strange problem with my monitor. In linux (RH 8.0) it is
> >>>just 'slightly' blurry. Not so blurry as to make it impossible to read,
> >>>but blurry enough that if I code here for more than 20 minutes or so, my
> >>>head is pounding from eye strain. If I boot up into windblows 2000 it's
> >>>nice and crisp using the same resolution (1024 x 768). Any ideas how to
> >>>fix this? I've tried all kinds of refresh rates to no avail. I even
> >>>tried 800 x 600 (eeek), but it was blurry there as well.
> >>>Here's my config:
> >>>RedHat 8.0 (haven't upgraded anything until I figure this out so it's
> >>>all distro defaults)
> >>>GeForce 2 MX 400 (Also tried a PCI ATI Xpert 128 with same result)
> >>>Shamrock C903P5 19" monitor.
> >>>
> >>>it HAS to be something in the monitor settings. I tried this before with
> >>>RedHat 7.2 and 7.3 on a machine with an Intel 810 (I think), but ended
> >>>up going back to 2000. Well I've decided that I'm NEVER using another MS
> >>>product, so I have to figure this out now.
> >>>
> >>>Any ideas or insight would be greatly appreciated.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>   Assuming by "blurry" you aren't saying that the fonts are anti-
> >>aliased.  Some people consider that a feature.
> >>
> >>   It really just sounds like a bad monitor or cable.  Are you
> >>sure the refresh rate isn't too high?  At the same resolution
> >>higher refresh rates will look fuzzier.
> >>
> >>
> >>                    Mark.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >XFree86 mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> XFree86 mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

Reply via email to