Glen,
Besides dispute resolution and accountability, VANS could also offer value added
services such as encryption, decryption, data conversion/transformation,
archiving, data warehousing, statistics, tranck & trace, digtial key center and
content hosing.
A solution to your "standards" problem, could be to ask your VANS to
convert/transform your and your trading partners' XML (or other)formats to which
ever is preferred, in which case you don't have to make the choice between
Rosetta, ebXML, etc.
Just remember - the bilateral EDI agreements between you and your trading
partners, will not change because you change media and/or data formats.
Best regards
Dan Net A/S
Thomas Andersen
Product Manager.
=====================================================
Email from Dan Net A/S
Advanced solutions for Data Clearing, e- & m-business
Dan Net A/S Tel: +45 4582 1600
Blokken 9 Direct: +45 4590 2031
DK-3460 Birkeroed Fax: +45 4582 1644
Denmark Cell: +45 2946 7775
http://www.dannet.com
=====================================================
"Glen T. Dudley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 23-04-2001 21:32:42
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Eck, Jeffery (GXS)'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Thomas Andersen/Dan Net)
Subject: RE: Data Transport Question
Thank you very much for everyone that has responded to my question.
I have requested as much information from my trading partner as they can
give me on there XML,
This could take a few days, So I thought I would ask a few more questions.
(These are not direct questions just thoughts out load to see if any one
else has had these same questions)
This is my current situation:
We are doing EDI transaction using the X12(3040) format.
We have a VAN that we use, I was told that this was for dispute resolution
and
accountability. The VAN that we use charges us a per kilo-byte charge. if
our trading partner
wishes to continue using the VAN this will greatly increase the cost for
each transaction.
If the trading partners don't wish to use the VAN I wonder why we are paying
for this service now.
It also makes me think that if we drop the VAN and use a direct transaction,
We could do this now
with the EDI format. What would be the advantage to using XML ,besides
making it slightly more
human readable? Is there some advantage or dis-advantage that I'm missing?
Or is this just an
effort to replace the current X12/EDIFACT Standard?
As I said before these are not really direct questions just wondering if any
one has and thoughts on this.
Or has any one else had these questions when you started with XML/EDI?
Thank you very much for your time.
Glen T. Dudley
Programmer/Analyst
MBIA
Matsushita Battery Industrial Corporation of America
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)
digest xmledi-group your-email-address
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)
digest xmledi-group your-email-address
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
