> > 2. Include tree-widget > > I think tla-browse is good enough at the replacement of tla-archives, > > tla-categories, tla-branches and tla-versions. > > I didn't use tla-browse very much until now. I tried some stuff now > and it works very well for me! Nice work Masatake!
Thank you. > However I think, we should keep tla-archives,... because it is easier > for new users, if they can use the already known commands from the > commandline invocation. I agree they are eaiser to use and lightweight. There are some steps: 1. Add tree-widget to xtla 2. Make tla-browse as the essential part of xtla. It is option now. 3. Remove tla-archives. You wrote 3. is not acceptable, How about 1. and 2.? > We could add a note in the docstring and we should add a keybinding > and a menu entry to enter the browser from various places. Yes. Improving the cooperation between inventory, bookmark and browser are important task. I think we should use `hook' heavily. However, I don't want to support both tla-archives and tla-browse about documentation and source code. Maybe this one is the issue in the meeting:)
