Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However I think, we should keep tla-archives,... because it is easier > > for new users, if they can use the already known commands from the > > commandline invocation. > > I agree they are eaiser to use and lightweight. > There are some steps: > > 1. Add tree-widget to xtla > 2. Make tla-browse as the essential part of xtla. It is option now. > 3. Remove tla-archives. > > You wrote 3. is not acceptable, How about 1. and 2.?
1., 2. are o.k. for me. It would be also nice to show the bookmarks via the tree-widget. Something like the topic mode from gnus. This feature would allow to manage a large collection of archives. > > We could add a note in the docstring and we should add a keybinding > > and a menu entry to enter the browser from various places. > > Yes. Improving the cooperation between inventory, bookmark and browser are > important task. I think we should use `hook' heavily. > > However, I don't want to support both tla-archives and tla-browse > about documentation and source code. You are right, the more functions we have, the more documentation is needed ;-). I think, it is better to keep tla-archives and let it undocumented as to remove it. > Maybe this one is the issue in the meeting:) Yes, and a bunch of other things. Stefan.
