Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you mean we should remove xtla-browse.el from xtla-1.0.tar.gz? If > so, I don't agree with you. I already write much documents based on > xtla-browse.el.
No, off course not. The presence of xtla-browse is not harmfull for anyone as long a no other module depend on it, and it's really appreciable when it works ;-) > If tla-browse is bundled to xtla-1.0 as its *optional* part, That's it. -- Matthieu
