> >> So, I think xtla-browse full integration with the rest of xtla could > >> be delayed untill the 1.0 is out. > > > > Do you mean we should remove xtla-browse.el from xtla-1.0.tar.gz? If > > so, I don't agree with you. I already write much documents based on > > xtla-browse.el. > > > > If tla-browse is bundled to xtla-1.0 as its *optional* part, I agree > > with you. Another request is to add the latest tree-widget.el to xtla > > like ewoc. > > I think we should support older emacs versions (21.x) out of the box. > To make tla-browse usable without any hurdles we should incldue > tree-widget.el. > > > In stead I will make efforts for > > > > 1. Support Emacs 21.3 with the latest tree-widget.el in tla-browse > > 2. Support XEmacs with the latest tree-widget.el in tla-browse > > Fine. > > To summarize: > * Add tree-widget.el > * Keep tla-browse as optional part
My idea is to add only tree-widget.el. I will not add bitmaps/pixmaps bundled with tree-widget to xtla. I'll add tree-widget.el and write about it in INSTALL tonight. > > The biggest question is documentation. Will we fill the texinfo file > > till 1.0? The documents I'm writing are > > > > - XTLA Bootstrap > > - Start a project with XTLA > > - Branch the project with XTLA > > - Run a Project in Anarchy Development Style > > Thanks for the efforts. > I will add a section about: > "Tracking a tla project with XTLA" Good idea. Different from programming, I think it is not so easy to write documents collaboratively. So I propose splitting the documentation process into two stage - Each developer writes a document about a topic which s/he think interesting separately from other developer - Compile them into a single info file. BTW, does anyone know a good Free software or Open source magazine? We can contribute(good term?) articles. > > xtla-cmd.el: Simple one shot command like tla-commit, > > tla-insert-arch-tag, tla-my-id > > xtla-bookmarks.el > > xtla-inventory.el > > xtla-diff.el > > xtla-revisions.el > > xtla-twbrowse.el > > xtla-bbbrowse.el > > xtla-gnue.el > > > > xtla-middle.el includes middle level functions shared > > by USER INTERFACE layer. > > I think you have found a nice way to split the functionality. > However we need no hurry in doing the split. Yes. I'm taling about 2.0 in which tla-browse becomes essential part of xtla. Masatake
