On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Marc Clifton wrote: > > Well, maybe clearly saying "XUL is an open UI language standard as > compared to these other ones" might be helpful.
But it isn't. As Gerald likes to point out, there isn't even a complete spec. It certainly isn't a standard by any meaningful use of the word. > I also think something could be said in general about the commonality of > XML UI languages. What has _XML_ got to do with anything? Web Apps 1.0 isn't an XML language, it's HTML-based. Avalon, Flash, Win32, Dashboard, GTK -- none of those are XML based, and they are the biggest competitors to WA1. > Yes, this section is supposed to simply say "there is no relationship", > but hey, you open the door a crack, let's do it right, right? I'm not really sure what you want the section to say. > Ian, any comments about my editorial remarks? I encourage you to send your comments to the WHATWG mailing list. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
