Re: [xul-talk] WHAT WG Spokesman Declares Mozilla XUL a proprietary language - Comments?

[Marc Clifton]

Huh? Does XUL welcome external patches?  How can something that's proprietary do so?  And what does external patches have to do with competition? Well, I'll play along.  Since MyXaml is open source, you can patch it to your heart's content.  In fact, you probably don't need to patch it since the parser is designed to allow complete extensibility of the XML simply by implementing your own assemblies.  You can also add custom property handlers for existing class implementations, thus extending the functionality of a class even if you don't have the source code! Marc Ian Hickson wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Charles Goodwin wrote: On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 09:27 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: XUL doesn't _need_ competition, in that any efforts made by people working on a competing product could be put to better use simply making the existing XUL runtime better. What a coincidence! Vexi doesn't need competition either, and any efforts made by people on a competing product could be put to better use simply making the existing Vexi runtime better! Correct, assuming Vexi welcomes external patches. What's that Marc? MyXAML doesn't need competition either, and any efforts made by people on a competing product could be put to better use simply making the existing MyXAML runtime better? Oh! Also correct, assuming the same thing. I could go on. That's a bit of a silly comment really Ian. Why? ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk