Daniel, we had wireless-dev for 2.6.19, but I had no idea about your work for 2.6.20. Actually I wanted to integrate Jon Smirl's patch, but there was already the fix in wireless-2.6.
I would like to use the name wireless-2.6, because that indicates better, that it is against wireless-2.6. Notify that Jon has called the descape/d80211 tree wireless-dev. So wireless-dev might not be the most prudent choice. However wireless-2.6 includes only a single patch, so it shouldn't be to difficult to use wireless-dev. I know that we have discussed already, but I suggest again to move also with the softmac-based driver to in-tree development. It would certainly save time. I would still create a tar tree, that could be compiled outside of the kernel. Regarding the known issues of my master tree. I admit there are problems with the AL2230 RF, which doesn't work very well for me with or without the signal strength handling. There are no such issues with the RF2959. How about doing signal strength handling only for RF2959? 2.6.19.1 without softmac-patches is not a good setup, because deauthentication is not handled. It should also be noted, that calling ieee80211_rx in hard irq context might create problems in specific setups. This is fixed in my tree. Kind regards, Uli -- Uli Kunitz ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.ath.cx/ Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs
