Wa alaikum salam, 1. The chief developer of the application is a Persian speaker, and zekr is an excellent approximation in most Western languages of the sound of the *Persian* word ذكر (IPA representation /zekɾ/) which is descended from the Arabic word much as the English noun rock is descended from the Vulgar Latin word "rocca," itself probably descended from an unknown Celtic predecessor.
2. To an English speaker thikr looks like a transliteration of ثكر (compare the word "thicker") and it is more common to use dh to represent the sound of ذ (cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanization_of_Arabic). They differ in that dhal is one of the letters of jahr and thaa' is one of the letters of hams. Hence the use of the voiced Roman "d" over the voiceless "t". In phonetic terms the first is a voiced and the second a voiceless dental fricative, represented by IPA /ð/ and /θ/ respectively. Of course English has the unfortunate counter-example of "this" which I guess proves me wrong, but if we have to assign "th" to either ذ or ث, then I think anyone would chose the latter. So I think the founder should be free to name the program in his own language, though if anyone using Zekr to read, say, verse 9 of Sura al-Jum`uah were to say "zekr" instead of "dhikr" they would definitely be in the wrong. Remember me in your duas. On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Rocca <iamro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Salam brothers, > > Your program is such a beautiful and amazing program. I really love > how well-done it is, the speed, the functionality, the ability to > browse or search and find things so quickly. It's just amazing, and I > really do love it. However, I must say that the pronunciation of the > actual Arabic word ذكر is not with the letter Z at all, but with the > letters TH. I partially think that it was the mistake of Arabs a long > time ago, those who delivered the message of Islam to their brothers > in Asia, that they did not emphasize how the words of the Quran should > really be pronounced. For example, Dr. Zakir Naik should not be > written like that at all, according to how the name looks like in Urdu > or Arabic, but it should be written as Dr. Thakir Naeek. Similarly, > ذكر should not be written as Zekr, but Thikr. And it does make quite a > remarkable difference in some Arabic words, if someone pronounces that > Thal ذ as Zein ز. > > I hope that my message will make sense to you, and you can consult any > number of scholars that you like to double check that all this is > true. I realize that this entails perhaps a lot of changes, including > the domain names and all, and it is up to you. I just think that the > program and its message would be that much more beautiful if inspires > the non-Arabs to pronounce the words and letters of the Quran as they > are supposed to be pronounced. > > God bless. > > Warm regards, > Rocca > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "zekr" group. > To post to this group, send email to z...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > zekr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/zekr?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zekr" group. To post to this group, send email to z...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to zekr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/zekr?hl=en.