using extremes is one of the most basic of logical fallacies. if that is how 
you make decisions. you are lost!

----------
Sent from the Cingular network using Mobile Email

------Original Message------
From: Vince <everythingzen1...@yahoo.com>
To: <Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, Dec 20, 2008 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Zen] Ducks Have Buddha Nature?

In all things, the easiest way to find a flaw in an argument is to see it in 
it's extreme......
Men fall below crocodiles in terms of Predator/Prey relationship, so by this 
token, a crocodile has a Buddha nature where man does not?
After all, we ARE meant to be food for crocodiles.




________________________________
From: Karin Machado <tortiller...@yahoo.com>
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 6:54:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Zen] Ducks Have Buddha Nature?


Are some animals created to be food and therefore have no Buddha Nature? Are 
plants and insects without Buddha Nature because they are at the bottom of the 
food chain?? 
   

------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to