using extremes is one of the most basic of logical fallacies. if that is how you make decisions. you are lost!
---------- Sent from the Cingular network using Mobile Email ------Original Message------ From: Vince <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Dec 20, 2008 11:42 AM Subject: Re: [Zen] Ducks Have Buddha Nature? In all things, the easiest way to find a flaw in an argument is to see it in it's extreme...... Men fall below crocodiles in terms of Predator/Prey relationship, so by this token, a crocodile has a Buddha nature where man does not? After all, we ARE meant to be food for crocodiles. ________________________________ From: Karin Machado <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 6:54:27 AM Subject: Re: [Zen] Ducks Have Buddha Nature? Are some animals created to be food and therefore have no Buddha Nature? Are plants and insects without Buddha Nature because they are at the bottom of the food chain?? ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
