Steve,
 
A Tibetan monk (I don't remember who) was incarcerated, facing a torturing 
jailer. He practiced tonglen, giving away his good karma, in exchange for the 
jailer's bad deeds. After a while, the latter relented and gave him better 
treatment. Eventually, the monk was released and came to live with Dalai Lama 
in India. He was lucky enough to be dealing with the second/third generations 
of Chinese officers, who no long had to fight hard to gain control of the 
country. When the situation changed to a Khmer Rouge jail in Cambodia, no 
matter how much tonglen the prisoner did, he would not escape or lessen the 
torture and end up in a mass grave. We are in a lucky position of sitting 
quietly, discounting everything as illusion. Does that work to lessen suffering 
such as hunger, death, cancer pain etc?
 
Anthony

--- On Thu, 3/2/11, SteveW <[email protected]> wrote:


From: SteveW <[email protected]>
Subject: [Zen] Re: Eightfold Path
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 3 February, 2011, 11:37 AM


  





--- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@...> wrote:
>
> Steve,
> 
> Thank you for releasing me from a constant fear of being attacked by 
> enlightened beings. As regards 'tonglen', it is supposed to give away one's 
> good luck, in exchange for taking others' bad luck. This is a great 
> bodhisatva's practice. However, the Buddhist principle is that you can only 
> work on your own karma by yourself, and it is impossible to have others 
> influence your karma. Of course, they can guide you toward creating good 
> karma. Is tonglen in conformity with Buddhism?
> 
> Anthony
> 
> Hi Anthony. This is another one of those questions of dispute among
Buddhists. From the Theravada view-point, it is certainly
impossible. Many Mahayanists would say that parinamara, or transfer
of merit, is simply a metaphor for letting go of self-interest.
However, it is taken quite seriously in Pureland. While seemingly
contradicting the law of cause and effect, parinamara does make
sense if, as I believe, reality is one seamlessly interwoven
Whole. That is why I said in an earlier post that our common-
sense notions of cause and effect may, in fact, be illusiory.
Steve








Reply via email to