No trouble. It is much harder to keep track of individuals on list servs than 
in real life. I am actually never sure of the difference between you and Steve. 
You both like martial arts and the idea of no-self, but one claims to have 
achieved mystic union pre Zen and the other is climbing a mountain range?  

Thanks,
Chris Austin-Lane
Sent from a cell phone

On Mar 8, 2011, at 21:28, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Chris,
>  
> Fair enough, I see what you're driving at. I created my own confusion by 
> trying to juggle to posts (from you and ED) at the same time, but now I can 
> see they were quite different animals (my point to ED was about compassion 
> and compassionate action just arising, and doesn't have to such a well 
> thought out process behind it re the Red Cross parcel bit). My bad.
>  
> Mike
> 
> From: Chris Austin-Lane <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: mike brown <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed, 9 March, 2011 10:46:39
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Two Potent Quotes
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:20 AM, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >Well, of course an action can't be performed by thought (Uri Geller proved 
> >that point), but it
> > usually has its genesis in that thought, and the thought process continues 
> > making
> >  observations and judgements during and after the particular action.
> 
> I don't think that's really true.  I think people may retroactively make up 
> some story about this or that thought leading to some action, but generally 
> the action arises.  And judgements are totally separate, really if you 
> believe the judgment, it is a separate action. 
> 
> I certainly empathise with the 'everyday lifeness' (I think that's a new 
> phrase) sentiment of your point, but I find the opposite to be true. When I 
> equivocate or second guess myself in a situation where an immediate response 
> would be preferrable, I usually end up making a mess, or regreting, a 
> situation that might have been better dealt with spontaneously and 
> intuitively. This is not to suggest, however, that some decisions shouldn't 
> be made thru careful consideration of the facts, it's just that we often do 
> this quite needlessly.
> 
> Whoa!  I'm sure I never wrote about equivocate, second guessing, or avoiding 
> the spontaneous action (personally, I find "intuitive" to be a word tightly 
> linked to thoughts - a flash of intuitive insight is something I stake my 
> professional life on, and it is always a thought, never an action.  Careful 
> consideration of the facts?  Eh, sometimes I guess.  Certainly not in the 
> example I used of catching an ice cream scoop as it falls to the floor.  I 
> suppose when you are trying to decide on what house to buy with your spouse, 
> some planning activity is useful, but I try not to get carried away with it 
> or too attached.  
> 
> --Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to