years ago when i was 20..i had a golden light experience..
. walking down a street  in evening in city.
.suddenly all glowed in a golden light

 and much late at age 36
..i had a nivana experience..i felt it .

.absolutely beautiful both experiences

what can one say?
 it just happened...

 leaving no stone unturned
 i await
listening to the wind
 speaking the language of realisation in the bamboo grove this evening

 merle


On 7/1/2012 11:07 PM, Kristopher Grey wrote:

  
>The mention of Lao Tzu and Confucius brings to mind the ground upon 
>which Ch'an took root - and how this has shaped the
              practices/teachings.
>
>To greatly over-simplify:
>
>Zen may appear at times inwardly Taoist, outwardly
              Confucian. At other 
>times the reverse. Zen is unconcerned with such
              appearances.
>
>By this, I am also pointing to the nature of all such
              appearances 
>commonly discussed and debated (such talk appearing to me
              to be more 
>about Zen Buddhism [or all forms of Buddhism] - than Zen
              realization - 
>but this only appears so). Some common/familiar themes
              emerge, some 
>apparent contrasts, others apparently complimentary (a
              short set as 
>example, in no particular order):
>
>West/East
>Chaos/Order
>Samsara/Nirvana
>Ordinary/Divine
>Path/Attainment
>Deluded/Realized
>Householder/Monastic
>Sudden/Gradual
>Meditation/Sutras
>Etc./Etc...
>
>The fodder of forums such as this.
>
>Ordinary mind sees separation between these forms, and
              identifies with 
>them more/less, seeking to find it's way - thus
              forming/borrowing a 
>''path'- or perhaps falling into the void by mistaking "/"
              as the 
>'middle way' - mistaking forsaking for equanimity
              (accepting 'no-self' 
>as rejection of form rather than realizing empty nature of
              form).
>
>Buddha mind realizes all appearances as suchness, as
              abiding... Thus 
>ordinary mind/Buddha mind are one.
>
>I do not claim to be a [Zen] Buddhist , thus have no more
              than passing 
>interest in these (10,000) things - and see them as no
              help or 
>hindrance. Merely points of reflection, offering nothing
              less than 
>bewildering clarity revealed in all it's murkiness.
>
>There is no point I'm trying to make, no position I
              advance, nothing I 
>offer, no one I address this to.
>
>You know who you are. The path begins and ends here.
>
>What would you intend otherwise? What else would you
              expect?
>
>Questions not seeking answers.
>
>Pass the Sake.
>
>K
>
>


 

Reply via email to