ED, I've been trying to do just that in almost every one of my posts since I've been here but apparently not well enough... :-(
Edgar On Sep 6, 2012, at 9:41 AM, ED wrote: > > > > Edgar, > > What you mean by 'reality' is different from what Bill! means by 'reality'. > In a recent post, Bill! has stated in some detail the meaning he attaches to > the word 'reality. You may want to define what you mean by 'reality'. Then, > we may be able to see how and why you two are in disagreement over 'reality'. > > --ED > > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote: > > > > Bill! > > > > Whoh now Bill! It's YOU that is telling Merle TO run out on the street > > without looking because it is YOU than claims that reality has no logical > > structure and thus if Merle gets run over by a bus it's all in her mind as > > an illusion and not reality. > > > > It's ME that is telling Merle, and to the point you, NOT to run out on the > > street without looking because it's ME that is saying that buses are real > > and you can really get killed running out in front of one BECAUSE REALITY > > HAS A LOGICAL STRUCTURE AND FOLLOWS THE LAWS OF NATURE and that my friend > > is NOT an illusion... > > > > I do however agree with you, as I've often tried to point out, that each of > > us models the laws of nature somewhat differently in our respective minds. > > But because our mental models of reality are imperfect that DOES NOT MEAN > > that what they model, the laws of nature, do not exist.... > > > > Edgar > > >
