Edgar,

Evidently Merle's...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> But whose mind is conjuring up thoughts of tantrums?
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> On Oct 21, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Bill! wrote:
> 
> > Merle,
> > 
> > No, that's not the truth. I understand why a little kid cries and throws 
> > his toys when he doesn't get his way. That doesn't mean I agree with his 
> > actions nor do I want to copy his actions.
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Â that is the truth bill!!!!!! merle
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Â  
> > > Bill,
> > > 
> > > If you really understood you would agree!
> > > :-)
> > > 
> > > Edgar
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Oct 21, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > > 
> > > Â  
> > > >Merle,
> > > >
> > > >I understand Edgar most of the time and where he is coming from. I just 
> > > >don't agree.
> > > >
> > > >...Bill!
> > > >
> > > >--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >>   bill!..i can see where you are coming from and also where edgar 
> > > >> is coming from..so where am i coming from?
> > > >> i can understand and relate to what you both are saying
> > > >> 
> > > >>  god father BILL!.. aldous huxley is a genius...
> > > >>  next you'll be telling me your bored with leonardo da vinci
> > > >>  the genius  are then not your cup of tea?
> > > >> 
> > > >>  maybe edgar is a genius?
> > > >>  merle
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >>   
> > > >> Merle,
> > > >> 
> > > >> Edgar and I disagree on fundamental issues. In his post below I agree 
> > > >> only with the first paragraph. The rest of it, which basically says 
> > > >> some attachments are benign (actually, even necessary) and some 
> > > >> aren't, I disagree with. And his last sentence "Zen is not as simple 
> > > >> as many imagine!" is outright egregious. Zen is the most simple thing 
> > > >> you can imagine. IMO Edgar makes is complicated by trying to 
> > > >> UNDERSTAND and EXPLAIN it all the time. There is no need for, in fact 
> > > >> IMO there is a need NOT TO, try to understand zen.
> > > >> 
> > > >> You don't understand zen, you practice zen.
> > > >> 
> > > >> My reading of the ISLAND has bogged down midway in Chapter 4. It seems 
> > > >> very tedious and somewhat juvenile to me, but I'll keep going for at 
> > > >> least another couple chapters to see what might come next.
> > > >> 
> > > >> ...Bill!
> > > >> 
> > > >> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Bill!..what is it that you and edgar disagree on?... is this just 
> > > >> > childish one up manship?
> > > >> >  as we are all ONE
> > > >> >  then stands to reason..edgar and you are still on the same 
> > > >> > coin so to speak
> > > >> >  how is your island reading going ?
> > > >> >  merle
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >   
> > > >> > Merle,
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > I am 'listening' (reading actually), but there's nothing in this 
> > > >> > post for me to learn, nothing new anyway. I already am aware of how 
> > > >> > much Edgar and I disagree on zen - and I knew that already.
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > ...Bill!
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > ÃÆ'‚ yes bill!..edgar is back..
> > > >> > > edgar is on the cutting edge..are you listening?... and need i say 
> > > >> > > learning?..merle
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > ÃÆ'‚  
> > > >> > > Suresh,
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > Attachment is a very valuable evolutionary survival mechanism. 
> > > >> > > It's a fundamental part of human nature similar to what we share 
> > > >> > > with other species. With no attachments individual humans would 
> > > >> > > have no motivation or direction and would not survive.
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > The problem is not attachments per se. We all use attachments 
> > > >> > > every day to go about our lives successfully. That's what enables 
> > > >> > > people to sustain material success in life. The problem is 
> > > >> > > excessive attachment, or attachment to your attachments. The 
> > > >> > > problem is excessive attachments THAT DO NOT MESH WITH WHAT IS 
> > > >> > > REAL or attainable.ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > For example a man's attachment to THE IDEA OF an unattainable 
> > > >> > > woman, or an unattainable position in society. Attachment to the 
> > > >> > > unattainable causes suffering.ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > However attachment to the ATTAINABLE maintains physical and social 
> > > >> > > life.ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > However things can change. When one loses something one was 
> > > >> > > attached to realization demands changing one's attachment to it to 
> > > >> > > mirror the new state of reality.
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > Zen is not as simple as many imagine!
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > Edgar
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > On Oct 20, 2012, at 1:38 AM, SURESH JAGADEESAN wrote:
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > ÃÆ'‚  
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Bill
> > > >> > > >Why do human liked to get attached?
> > > >> > > >What is the root cause for attachment?
> > > >> > > >Suresh
> > > >> > > >On Oct 20, 2012 8:38 AM, "Merle Lester" <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (merlewiitpom@) 
> > > >> > > > Add cleanup rule | More info 
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 
> > > >> > > >>ÃÆ'‚  
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > >> > > >>ÃÆ'‚ so how does one NOT be attached to these 
> > > >> > > >>emotions eh?..merle
> > > >> > > >>ÃÆ'‚  
> > > >> > > >>Merle,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>No, these in-and-of themselves are not attachments. They are 
> > > >> > > >>concepts (mental models), and in some case emotions - and it is 
> > > >> > > >>not these that cause suffering. It is ATTACHMENTS to these that 
> > > >> > > >>cause suffering.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>...Bill!
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> > > >> > > >>wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> 
> > > >> > > >>> 
> > > >> > > >>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ thanks..are they 
> > > >> > > >>> attachments?... merle
> > > >> > > >>> Merle,
> > > >> > > >>> 
> > > >> > > >>> 
> > > >> > > >>> Love is not exactly the OPPOSITE of hate, but love/hate is a 
> > > >> > > >>> dualistic pair - like good/bad, tall/short, hot/cold, 
> > > >> > > >>> yin/yang, etc...
> > > >> > > >>> 
> > > >> > > >>> ...Bill!
> > > >> > > >>> 
> > > >> > > >>> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> > > >> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>> >
> > > >> > > >>> > 
> > > >> > > >>> > 
> > > >> > > >>> > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > > >> > > >>> > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> > > >> > > >>> >  tell me more BILLLL....... Love is it the opposite of 
> > > >> > > >>> > hate????? merle
> > > >> > > >>> > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > > >> > > >>> > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> > > >> > > >>> >   
> > > >> > > >>> > I agree with James.
> > > >> > > >>> > 
> > > >> > > >>> > As with all emotions like fear, anger, love, hate it is not 
> > > >> > > >>> > the emotion that is the real problem, it is the ATTACHMENT 
> > > >> > > >>> > to the emotion.
> > > >> > > >>> > 
> > > >> > > >>> > ...Bill!
> > > >> > > >>> > 
> > > >> > > >>> > --- In [email protected], "James W. Meritt" 
> > > >> > > >>> > <JWMeritt@> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > >>> > > 
> > > >> > > >>> > > Not so sure getting rid of fear is a good thing. I see 
> > > >> > > >>> > > having fear, but modifying how you use and react to it as 
> > > >> > > >>> > > a good thing.
> > > >> > > >>> > > 
> > > >> > > >>> > > 
> > > >> > > >>> > > 
> > > >> > > >>> > > James W. Meritt 
> > > >> > > >>> > > CISSP, CISA, NSA IAM, PMP
> > > >> > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > >>> >
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to