Hi Merle,

Yes, agreed. Lots of unrealized Zen Zombies out there in the malls. Also a few 
Zenbies stumbling mindlessly around in circles on this group as well...

Zen Mindlessness is not to be confused with Mall Mindlessness!

Edgar



On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Merle Lester wrote:

> 
> edgar.
> 
> .i can understand what you are saying...and that is how i see it except i 
> cannot explain it like you have..
> 
> .zen to me is being in the moment alert and forever present...as i see it we 
> zen through the day..
> 
> .practising zen to me is not sitting cross legged on "handwoven mats,  eyes 
> shut tight, sniffing incense and  listening to gongs."
> 
> .it's being out there in the real world every minute alert breathing the 
> breath..."zenning the zen"..so to speak..
> 
> . as as for those folk on those forum who are going to clap their hands and 
> shout "horror horror where the hell is she at"? let me remind them..
> 
> .it's not me who's struggling with zen understanding
> 
>  it's those hundreds of folk who we see everyday walking and talking as if in 
> a shadowland( plato's cave)..... 
> 
> next time you go to the shopping mall pay close attention and you'll very 
> soon understand
> 
> merle
> 
>  
> Edgar,
> 
> It's good to see you back and well. Unfortunately I can't say the same about 
> your theories. 
> 
> "It's an updated understanding of how mind works that was unknown when the 
> Zen texts were written."  
> 
> Are you saying that prior to this 'breakthru' in neuroscience the Patriarchs 
> weren't practicing 'real' Zen, but that you now are? Is this discovery 
> definitive or could there be further "updates" which would render the Zen you 
> practice now obsolete? Are you in fact practicing Zen or something  different 
> entirely?
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Monday, 29 October 2012, 22:34
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Is buddha nature coninuous?
> 
>  
> Joe,
> 
> I think you have a mistaken interpretation of what 'mind moving' actually 
> means...
> 
> Mind is a computational system that continually computes sensations, actions 
> etc. Thus mind continually moves. There is no escaping that so long as you 
> are alive. In fact measurements show that mind is almost as active during 
> sleep as when awake.
> 
> So mind always moves in that sense. Everything you do you do it precisely 
> because your mind is moving.
> 
> What Zen means by mind not moving is different. It means that mind moves in 
> sync with reality, not in opposition to it. This 'Zen is mind not moving' 
> platitude was written centuries ago when the computational dynamics of mind 
> were not understood. It refers to a state when you don't consciously think 
> you are deciding to take particular actions but actions seem to flow 
> spontaneously from an unconscious inner source. However it is now known that 
> is always happening anyway. The conscious mind actually very rarely makes any 
> decisions at all even though it thinks it does. That's the illusion. The 
> source of almost all decisions and actions is always the unconscious inner 
> computational system.
> 
> It's an updated understanding of how mind works that was unknown when the Zen 
> texts were written.
> 
> So Zen is 24/7, whether your mind is moving or not. If there is realization 
> that is. Zen is a matter of realizing what is actually happening, not getting 
> rid of all thoughts which is of course impossible if you want to function in 
> reality and survive through the day...
> 
> True mindlessness = lobotomy or more accurately being dead!
> 
> 
> If you want a reference even Suzuki Roshi agreed with this when I put it to 
> him...
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Joe wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Edgar,
>> 
>> Ha, ha.
>> 
>> Yeah, I don't get what motivates your comment.
>> 
>> Let's see if, no matter what mind you are in now, you can follow a logical 
>> exposition:
>> 
>> The Zen adept Sumie ink artists who paint big black circles on rice paper do 
>> so with a mind that does not move: I mean, they do it with NO mind (and 
>> hence, no mind-motion).
>> 
>> I remember our Shif-fu, on retreats, teaching us how to come OUT of 
>> meditation. He'd say, "MOVE YOUR MIND, first, then move your BODY, VERY 
>> SLOWLY, and sway your body in ever-widening circles from the waist, first in 
>> direction, then in the other".
>> 
>> That always seemed like un-necessary advice to me, before certain 
>> developments on retreat...
>> 
>> ...After which, I found that it was impossible to move the mind, and the 
>> body could nonetheless move.
>> 
>> But the months of life afterwards with the mind not moving at all was a 
>> continuing marvel and surprise. And yet, life was certainly possible, and 
>> richer than ever before. "Decisions" and actions were the best I have ever 
>> done.
>> 
>> And, Edgar, I found I could not only write, but I could type.
>> 
>> I had to type.
>> 
>> I needed to type because my job was to control an advanced radio-telescope 
>> from a Tektronix terminal at the top of Pupin Hall, 120th Street and 
>> Broadway. I discovered in these months giant filaments of cold molecular 
>> gas, constrained and confined by magnetic fields, in the Milky Way pouring 
>> from high above the galactic plane in the Orion-Arm, and down onto the 
>> galactic disk, where the supersonic impact from the flow stimulated the 
>> formation of stars in objects like Monoceros R2, and the Rosette Nebula. The 
>> Great Nebula M42 in Orion is part of this complex.
>> 
>> Decades more of practice and many more retreats and more awakenings showed 
>> the same nature and character of our empty, still, awakened state, in the 
>> midst of no-matter-what activity. No thoughts: nothing moving. Life is a 
>> continuous intuition: the only mind is the mind we all share, which is no 
>> mind.
>> 
>> I can say that the currents in the mind, or head, and the feeling or 
>> sensation that there are thoughts, or ANYTHING moving at all, is an illusion 
>> that pertains to the un-awakened state, and to that state only. These things 
>> are illusions and delusions, but the awakened state does not deprecate them: 
>> they are simply not present in the awakened state, however; not present at 
>> all.
>> 
>> Surely, in the un-awakened state, there is the sense of something moving, 
>> and of something that takes TIME to pass before the awareness. This appears 
>> to indicate that free action of the mind is dammed-up, or necked-down, in 
>> the un-awakened state, into a bottle-neck situation, which is just what we 
>> might also expect.
>> 
>> NOT in the awakened state. Nothing takes time.
>> 
>> Prajna is likened to LIGHTNING, for this reason, BTW.
>> 
>> See the Dorje lightning-bolt images at Tibetan places?
>> 
>> Prajna is entirely spontaneous and can not be mulled-over nor formulated.
>> 
>> Compassion arises simultaneously with Prajna. Compassion is not something 
>> that you FEEL, in the awakened state, you simply respond naturally.
>> 
>> And so it is.
>> 
>> --Joe
>> 
>> > Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Joe,
>> > 
>> > Well obviously your mind was moving when you wrote this... The mind has to 
>> > move to write...
>> > 
>> > THAT's the experience...
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to