A logical point, but isn't the experience of non-dual reality just seeing what is and appreciating it? The gap between "what is" (aka truth) and "what could be" (aka beauty) is gone and where we are is just perfect precious and with the right seeing beautiful.
Thanks, Chris Austin-Lane Sent from a cell phone On Nov 25, 2012, at 13:48, Edgar Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Merle, > > I agree that truth is beautiful. But it is NOT beauty per se... > > Edgar > > > > On Nov 25, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Merle Lester wrote: > >> >> edgar... don't get me going...truth is beauty and that is that...and beauty >> is truth...merle >> >> >> Merle, >> >> Come on Merle. Pointing out the two words have different meanings doesn't >> mean I don't appreciate both. Why would you assume otherwise? >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> On Nov 25, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Merle Lester wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> crap edgar.. >>> >>> i'm not pea podding you with this one! >>> >>> you have no poetry in your soul >>> >>> merle >>> >>> >>> Edgar, >>> >>> What's a synomymn of "Thesaurus"? ;-) >>> >>> --Joe >>> >>> > Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote: >>> > >>> > Beauty is not truth, nor is truth beauty. That's why they are two >>> > different words. >>> [snip] > > > >
