Merle,

Indeed everyday life can be meditation in practice, but it can also be just a 
blur of memories, judgments, projections - in other words  illusion.

...Bill! 

--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
>  life is meditation in practise!..merle
> 
> 
>   
> Joe
> 
> Agreed, the word Dharma is at best introductory, a basic perception . . . 
> 
> I don't have time to look for it, maybe someone has it at their disposal the 
> zen story about rivers and mountains being mountains, then rivers and 
> mountains not being mountains, and then rivers and mountains being mountains. 
> 
> As said I am headed out the door, duty calls . . .
> 
> But most importantly, both Bill and you are urging strong practice. 
> 
> On another post someone took Bill to task, jokingly I am sure, for only 
> practicing a certain amount of time. Some people don't need to meditate a 
> great deal. Some, it is written, for I have not witnessed it, move quickly 
> into samadhi. Although most do not. I certainly do not. I schlogg away at it 
> like an Ozarkian turnip eater just off the wagon. 
> 
> I like that, strong practice . . . 
> 
> /\
> 
> zendervish
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Joe"  wrote:
> >
> > Salik,
> > 
> > I think in the orthodox understanding of the usage in the Soto sect you 
> > mention it, the meaning of Dharma in "Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha" is the 
> > Teaching of the Buddha, which Bill! shows as def. #3 from the dictionary 
> > contents placed online for access.
> > 
> > Of course we can understand it as we like when we practice, it's impossible 
> > to limit it by making it narrower, and impossible to make it too broad, for 
> > practice purposes.  When we awaken, it will be clear as ICE what it means.
> > 
> > The definition is a calling card.  We must call the number to reach the 
> > party we want.  Or better, make our way to the address and have a visit in 
> > person.
> > 
> > Strong practice,
> > 
> > --Joe
> > 
> > > "salik888"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill
> > > 
> > > Contextually, using conventional agreed upon consensus building in terms 
> > > of Religion, history, cultural, etc . . . I would choose 3 when speaking 
> > > of Buddhism in the big picture as taught . . . but we were not talking 
> > > about this, Buddhism, Zen Buddhism, etc . . . I used it in, shall we say, 
> > > a metaphysical way, the way anyone who might have a slight bent this way 
> > > would understand, intrinsically . . . is the dharma everpresent? Now?
> > > 
> > > Since we understand the word to mean (I will take out the word nature, 
> > > your assessment) and use 'what is', "is" not illusion, then Buddha, 
> > > Dharma, and Sangah "is".
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to