Siska,

No, unfortunately not.

Edgar does this all the time.  He says something that seems to agree with what 
I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have stated.  In 
this case the word is 'forms'.

Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us and we 
perceive it with our intellect.  I believe we create the structures and 
superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.

The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they are 
part of reality.

We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, but in 
some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.

Other than that all is well...Bill! 

--- In [email protected], siska_cen@... wrote:
>
> Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
> 
> :-)
> Siska
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
> To: <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
> 
> Bill,
> 
> Total agreement as stated.
> 
> Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
> instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Siska,
> > 
> > As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion 
> > on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this 
> > statement ;>) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
> > 
> > Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
> > 
> > I looked for my self,
> > But my self was gone.
> > The boundaries of my being
> > Had disappeared in the sea.
> > Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
> > And a voice returned me to myself.
> > It always happens like this.
> > Sea turns on itself and foams,
> > And with every foaming bit another body.
> > Another being takes form.
> > And when the sea sends word,
> > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
> > - Rumi
> > 
> > I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
> > rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
> > back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing 
> > this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
> > 
> > I looked for my self,
> > But my self was gone.
> > The boundaries of my being
> > Had disappeared in the sea.
> > 
> > Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
> > of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
> > and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
> > sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
> > 
> > Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
> > And a voice returned me to myself.
> > It always happens like this.
> > 
> > Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
> > interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation 
> > between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
> > much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
> > 
> > Sea turns on itself and foams,
> > And with every foaming bit another body.
> > Another being takes form.
> > 
> > Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
> > thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
> > 
> > And when the sea sends word,
> > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
> > 
> > But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
> > into emptiness.
> > 
> > That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
> > comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], siska_cen@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bill,
> > > 
> > > I followed until: "Waves broke".
> > > 
> > > The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
> > > 
> > > Siska
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Bill!" BillSmart@
> > > Sender: [email protected]
> > > Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ..Bill!
> > >
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to