While I do not claim to an authority on the history of the sutra, I did take a 
course last year 
in the study of the Platform Sutra. I wasn��t aware of any scholars in 
particular who were 
questioning the historical authenticity of the sutra, but of course this 
doesn't mean that 
the sutra is 100% historically authentic. 

In China, several versions of the Sutra were discovered at different places and 
dated at 
different times. The various versions do differ from each other, and so you 
can't expect all 
of them to be historically accurate. The Tun-huang manuscript, the earliest of 
all versions, 
is generally understood to be the most authentic among all. 

Now we must be aware of the fact that Hui-neng himself didn��t write the sutra. 
It is 
presumably written by one of his disciples, and so it faces the same questions 
that the 
Bible faces: How much of it are the original sayings of the master? And how 
much are the 
teachings of the later traditions put into the master��s mouth? I don't think 
there is an 
objective way to find out, and so maybe it��s better that we should leave it at 
that. 

Personally, I don't think the historical authenticity issue really matters. I 
think what matters 
is whether the teachings of the sutra are speaking to you. If it doesn't help 
you in any way, 
then I see no point of reading it. But for me, I really enjoy reading the 
sutra, and it has 
helped me in many ways, and that��s what I would like to share with others. 

When it comes to spiritual matters, I think it is more important to find out 
what works for 
you than to solely confine to a single tradition. When I was a teenager, I was 
a Christian for 
years. It took me a long time to find out that Christianity was not for me. I 
guess there is 
always this trial-and-error period. When I get older, I find out that Eastern 
religions are 
more appealing to me. The important thing is to understand yourself and to find 
out what 
suits your spiritual needs. I don't believe that is just one single path for 
everybody, just as 
I don't believe there is just one true religion. If you find that certain 
practices are helping 
you, then by all means you should stick to them. But if they don��t work for 
you, I suggest 
that you look for other alternatives. 

In regard to that person who claims to be the Buddha�K Well, I guess if you 
agree with the 
Platform Sutra that our true nature is Buddha nature, then you can say every 
person is in 
his deepest essence a Buddha. But anytime someone claims to be the forth 
incarnation of 
the historical Buddha, I think it is just a fraud. 

cheers,
Garleon





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/hjtSRD/3MnJAA/i1hLAA/S27xlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Noble Eightfold Path: Right View, Right Intention, Right Speech, Right  Action, 
Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration, Right Livelihood 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZenForum/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to