--- In [email protected], "pipaclub_sanluis" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>    Of cours, you are right about the korean monks. But what you say 
> about zen, means that it began in China, right? Any how, Zen has taken 
> their different ways acording to the country that adopted it, and that 
> enriches it. Saludos.
>    Guillermo.


Hi Guillermo,

I totally agree with you that the Dharma is like water and takes the shape of 
the cultural container in which it is "poured". :-)

I  also did mean to say that Zen began in China (although Zen tradition would 
maintain that Mahakashyapa received a "special tradition outside of  tradition" 
from the Buddha Shakyamuni in India and that Bodhidharma, the revered 
"transmitter" of Ch'an or Zen Buddhism to China was the 28th Zen patriarch in 
an Indian lineage that stretches back to Mahakashyapa). What I meant to say 
was that the establishment of the two schools of Japanese Zen by Eisai and 
Dogen occured in the 12th century (over 500+ years after the alleged 
beginnings of Ch'an in China).

In Japan there is this saying" The seed of Zen was planted in India, it 
sprouted 
in China and flowered in Japan." .... I personally would say that it first 
flowered 
in China... and then later in Japan and Korea. :-)

One quick final note: It is common to maintain that Zen represents the 
confluence of two rivers: Indian meditational practices and Taoist philosophy. 
While I certainly don't disagree with this, I think it is a broad paint brush 
stoke 
and perhaps a bit simplistic :-).  For example, Ch'an or Zen certainly employs 
Taoist terminology but by the time Hui-neng (638-713) and his successors 
began laying down the "doctrinal" teachings of Ch'an, these "Taoist" terms 
had been reconceptualized and reframed. "Wu" ("nothingness" or "emptiness" 
as used in Ch'an writings is not identical to "Wu" in the "Tao Te Ching" - to 
cite 
one example. The early Ch'an writers were not the ones who laid this 
groundwork. Chi-tsang (549-623) and his Sanlun school had already 
reworked and reframed "Taoist" terms decades before Hui-neng. In addition, 
many of the metaphors that are now associated with Zen - e.g., the "finger 
pointing to the moon" - first appeared in the writings of Sanlun. I think it is 
more "accurate" to say that Zen represents the confluence of two rivers: Indian 
meditational practices and the reconceptualized Taoist terminology (now 
clearly Mahayana Buddhist in orientation) of Chinese Sanlun Buddhism.

Gassho,
ryhorikawa





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Click here to rescue a little child from a life of poverty.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/rAWabB/gYnLAA/i1hLAA/S27xlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Current Book Discussion: Appreciate Your Life by Taizan Maezumi Roshi 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZenForum/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to