Thanks for all your thoughts Martin. I agree that breaking things hard, one time, is better than small breaks between every version. And these are really design breaks you're talking about, with good reasons for making those breaks, correct?
It's not arbitrary, building some level of consensus seems possible, and it seems much better to break things now, making life better for everyone (you included) in the long term. I don't know how many people use 0MQ in production today, or how many will be adversely affected by the breaks, but the number is probably small compared to when 0MQ reaches critical mass and change is *really* painful, and for a *lot* of people. -- Gregg (whose pain will be small right now) _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
