This is great news, Andriy. :)
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, guys. > So I've decided to release erlangzmq under MPLv2. One unintended side-effect > of this porject has been that I actually sold a few of my math-history books > (Fibonacci, his numbers and his rabbits) and getting my book out there is > worth more than any money I could ever make on this codebase. > > I was not really happy with the name, and neither "erlangmq" nor > "erlangzmtp" sounded right. So I just made up a completely new name: chumak. > I am still undecided about the "zeromq organization", so I'll keep it in my > repo for now. You're free to clone it if you like. > > New project can be found here: > https://github.com/chovencorp/chumak > > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 at 03:15 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ErlangMQ is a good name IMO, and you can always use that case style in >> documentation and erlangmq in source. >> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Never-mind regarding the name, I see the JeroMQ, NetMQ. It only makes >> > sense >> > to call it "erlangmq" (alas, Erlang does not use came-casing). >> > >> > >> > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 16:41 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> One more question, regarding the name, isn't ZMTP just "ZeroMQ-MTP" >> >> What >> >> is "ZeroMQ" itself then? >> >> Is it the c-library itself specifically? >> >> >> >> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 16:18 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I see that you often accept pull requests yourself. Would I be able to >> >>> accept PR on behalf of the project? Or are only the "admin" teams >> >>> allowed to >> >>> merge? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 15:36 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> The project is still owned by you and anyone else you select. There >> >>>> are admin teams who get some rights over projects; I think we had one >> >>>> case of over-reach with this, didn't happen again. If for some insane >> >>>> reason people remove your rights (I guess anything's possible given >> >>>> an >> >>>> infinite future), you fork the project back to your safe space and >> >>>> make a public noise. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> > Agreed on the name. Will do. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Oh phew, I thought you were beeing serious about the skype >> >>>> > interview >> >>>> > there >> >>>> > for a second. :-) >> >>>> > Is the project "owned" by anyone at that point? What's to prevent >> >>>> > me >> >>>> > being >> >>>> > removed from the "admins" (just hypothetical question)? >> >>>> > >> >>>> > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 14:11 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> You need to pay us a fee in small-unit BTC (to be discussed) and >> >>>> >> then >> >>>> >> pass through the initiation ceremony, which involves firstly the >> >>>> >> short >> >>>> >> 6-hour Skype interview about your understanding of queuing theory >> >>>> >> as >> >>>> >> it intersects with Conways' Law, then a longer Q&A session with >> >>>> >> the >> >>>> >> Elders of the Zero, as we like to call ourselves. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Just kidding. It's simply a place on github, that lets you claim >> >>>> >> the >> >>>> >> project is "official" and lets us boast we have more "official" >> >>>> >> projects. No change in the project organization or admin. We have >> >>>> >> our >> >>>> >> recommendations for license and process yet you're not forced to >> >>>> >> follow these. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> See http://zeromq.org/docs:organization >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> BTW I really would suggest a rename to make it clearer it's not a >> >>>> >> binding but a complete implementation. Either using "zmtp" in the >> >>>> >> name, or something MQ, is the fashion. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> -Pieter >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk >> >>>> >> <[email protected]> >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> > Hi, Peter. >> >>>> >> > What did you mean by "bring the project into the ZeroMQ >> >>>> >> > organization on >> >>>> >> > github"? >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > Would I still be able to oversee the development process? In >> >>>> >> > particular, >> >>>> >> > accepting patches, nominating contributors etc... >> >>>> >> > How does that work? >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > Thank you. >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 12:39 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> >> >>>> >> > wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> Thanks Pieter. I've read all those things when I learned zmq :) >> >>>> >> >> I >> >>>> >> >> agree >> >>>> >> >> with what you're suggesting, but that model doesn't really work >> >>>> >> >> for me >> >>>> >> >> at >> >>>> >> >> this time. I was thinking of trying it this way for a year to >> >>>> >> >> see >> >>>> >> >> what >> >>>> >> >> happens in the future. >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> Elliot, thanks for that distinction. I've never thought about >> >>>> >> >> that >> >>>> >> >> but >> >>>> >> >> it >> >>>> >> >> makes perfect sense. >> >>>> >> >> Regarding curve, that would be amazing. This was going to be my >> >>>> >> >> next >> >>>> >> >> goal. >> >>>> >> >> You can contact me at [email protected] so we can discuss it >> >>>> >> >> further. >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 5:10 a.m. Elliot Crosby-McCullough, >> >>>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> Hi Andriy, >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> Glad to see a full BEAM implementation. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> I've been working on something similar in Elixir >> >>>> >> >>> (https://github.com/SmartCasual/elixir-zeromq) but since >> >>>> >> >>> you've >> >>>> >> >>> gotten >> >>>> >> >>> further in Erlang I'll take a look at contributing Curve >> >>>> >> >>> support >> >>>> >> >>> to >> >>>> >> >>> yours >> >>>> >> >>> instead, since all I really wanted was native BEAM instead of >> >>>> >> >>> a >> >>>> >> >>> binding to >> >>>> >> >>> the C library given the dangers and/or inefficiencies of doing >> >>>> >> >>> so. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> I'll have to look more closely into the licensing you've gone >> >>>> >> >>> for >> >>>> >> >>> to >> >>>> >> >>> see >> >>>> >> >>> whether it's compatible with my needs. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> Small note, but what you've got there is an implementation not >> >>>> >> >>> a >> >>>> >> >>> binding >> >>>> >> >>> (which is a good thing). It would be a binding if it used >> >>>> >> >>> e.g. >> >>>> >> >>> the C >> >>>> >> >>> library to do the work. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>>> >> >>> Elliot >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> On 28 June 2016 at 18:09, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> >> >>>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> At Pieter's suggestion, I am putting this here: >> >>>> >> >>>> https://github.com/chovencorp/erlangzmq >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Native erlang 18 implementation of ZMTP 3.1 (including >> >>>> >> >>>> resource >> >>>> >> >>>> property), but without any security. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Hopefully it will be useful to people. I know I'll use it >> >>>> >> >>>> myself >> >>>> >> >>>> - >> >>>> >> >>>> since >> >>>> >> >>>> all (native) erlang bindings are out of date. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> This is a six month young project, so this is NOT performance >> >>>> >> >>>> or >> >>>> >> >>>> otherwise tested at all, and I would appreciate any feedback >> >>>> >> >>>> (just >> >>>> >> >>>> take a >> >>>> >> >>>> second to file an issue). >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you, >> >>>> >> >>>> --Andriy Drozdyuk >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >> >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>>> >> >>>> [email protected] >> >>>> >> >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>>> >> >>> [email protected] >> >>>> >> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>>> >> > [email protected] >> >>>> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>>> >> [email protected] >> >>>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>>> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>>> > [email protected] >> >>>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>>> [email protected] >> >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
