I see that you often accept pull requests yourself. Would I be able to accept PR on behalf of the project? Or are only the "admin" teams allowed to merge?
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 15:36 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > The project is still owned by you and anyone else you select. There > are admin teams who get some rights over projects; I think we had one > case of over-reach with this, didn't happen again. If for some insane > reason people remove your rights (I guess anything's possible given an > infinite future), you fork the project back to your safe space and > make a public noise. > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <dro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Agreed on the name. Will do. > > > > Oh phew, I thought you were beeing serious about the skype interview > there > > for a second. :-) > > Is the project "owned" by anyone at that point? What's to prevent me > being > > removed from the "admins" (just hypothetical question)? > > > > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 14:11 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > >> > >> You need to pay us a fee in small-unit BTC (to be discussed) and then > >> pass through the initiation ceremony, which involves firstly the short > >> 6-hour Skype interview about your understanding of queuing theory as > >> it intersects with Conways' Law, then a longer Q&A session with the > >> Elders of the Zero, as we like to call ourselves. > >> > >> Just kidding. It's simply a place on github, that lets you claim the > >> project is "official" and lets us boast we have more "official" > >> projects. No change in the project organization or admin. We have our > >> recommendations for license and process yet you're not forced to > >> follow these. > >> > >> See http://zeromq.org/docs:organization > >> > >> BTW I really would suggest a rename to make it clearer it's not a > >> binding but a complete implementation. Either using "zmtp" in the > >> name, or something MQ, is the fashion. > >> > >> -Pieter > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <dro...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > Hi, Peter. > >> > What did you mean by "bring the project into the ZeroMQ organization > on > >> > github"? > >> > > >> > Would I still be able to oversee the development process? In > particular, > >> > accepting patches, nominating contributors etc... > >> > How does that work? > >> > > >> > Thank you. > >> > > >> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 12:39 Andriy Drozdyuk <dro...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Thanks Pieter. I've read all those things when I learned zmq :) I > agree > >> >> with what you're suggesting, but that model doesn't really work for > me > >> >> at > >> >> this time. I was thinking of trying it this way for a year to see > what > >> >> happens in the future. > >> >> > >> >> Elliot, thanks for that distinction. I've never thought about that > but > >> >> it > >> >> makes perfect sense. > >> >> Regarding curve, that would be amazing. This was going to be my next > >> >> goal. > >> >> You can contact me at dro...@choven.ca so we can discuss it further. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 5:10 a.m. Elliot Crosby-McCullough, > >> >> <elliot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi Andriy, > >> >>> > >> >>> Glad to see a full BEAM implementation. > >> >>> > >> >>> I've been working on something similar in Elixir > >> >>> (https://github.com/SmartCasual/elixir-zeromq) but since you've > gotten > >> >>> further in Erlang I'll take a look at contributing Curve support to > >> >>> yours > >> >>> instead, since all I really wanted was native BEAM instead of a > >> >>> binding to > >> >>> the C library given the dangers and/or inefficiencies of doing so. > >> >>> > >> >>> I'll have to look more closely into the licensing you've gone for to > >> >>> see > >> >>> whether it's compatible with my needs. > >> >>> > >> >>> Small note, but what you've got there is an implementation not a > >> >>> binding > >> >>> (which is a good thing). It would be a binding if it used e.g. the > C > >> >>> library to do the work. > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Elliot > >> >>> > >> >>> On 28 June 2016 at 18:09, Andriy Drozdyuk <dro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> At Pieter's suggestion, I am putting this here: > >> >>>> https://github.com/chovencorp/erlangzmq > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Native erlang 18 implementation of ZMTP 3.1 (including resource > >> >>>> property), but without any security. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hopefully it will be useful to people. I know I'll use it myself - > >> >>>> since > >> >>>> all (native) erlang bindings are out of date. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> This is a six month young project, so this is NOT performance or > >> >>>> otherwise tested at all, and I would appreciate any feedback (just > >> >>>> take a > >> >>>> second to file an issue). > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thank you, > >> >>>> --Andriy Drozdyuk > >> >>>> > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list > >> >>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list > >> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > zeromq-dev mailing list > >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> zeromq-dev mailing list > >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
