ErlangMQ is a good name IMO, and you can always use that case style in documentation and erlangmq in source.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Never-mind regarding the name, I see the JeroMQ, NetMQ. It only makes sense > to call it "erlangmq" (alas, Erlang does not use came-casing). > > > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 16:41 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> One more question, regarding the name, isn't ZMTP just "ZeroMQ-MTP" What >> is "ZeroMQ" itself then? >> Is it the c-library itself specifically? >> >> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 16:18 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I see that you often accept pull requests yourself. Would I be able to >>> accept PR on behalf of the project? Or are only the "admin" teams allowed to >>> merge? >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 15:36 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The project is still owned by you and anyone else you select. There >>>> are admin teams who get some rights over projects; I think we had one >>>> case of over-reach with this, didn't happen again. If for some insane >>>> reason people remove your rights (I guess anything's possible given an >>>> infinite future), you fork the project back to your safe space and >>>> make a public noise. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Agreed on the name. Will do. >>>> > >>>> > Oh phew, I thought you were beeing serious about the skype interview >>>> > there >>>> > for a second. :-) >>>> > Is the project "owned" by anyone at that point? What's to prevent me >>>> > being >>>> > removed from the "admins" (just hypothetical question)? >>>> > >>>> > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 14:11 Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> You need to pay us a fee in small-unit BTC (to be discussed) and then >>>> >> pass through the initiation ceremony, which involves firstly the >>>> >> short >>>> >> 6-hour Skype interview about your understanding of queuing theory as >>>> >> it intersects with Conways' Law, then a longer Q&A session with the >>>> >> Elders of the Zero, as we like to call ourselves. >>>> >> >>>> >> Just kidding. It's simply a place on github, that lets you claim the >>>> >> project is "official" and lets us boast we have more "official" >>>> >> projects. No change in the project organization or admin. We have our >>>> >> recommendations for license and process yet you're not forced to >>>> >> follow these. >>>> >> >>>> >> See http://zeromq.org/docs:organization >>>> >> >>>> >> BTW I really would suggest a rename to make it clearer it's not a >>>> >> binding but a complete implementation. Either using "zmtp" in the >>>> >> name, or something MQ, is the fashion. >>>> >> >>>> >> -Pieter >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > Hi, Peter. >>>> >> > What did you mean by "bring the project into the ZeroMQ >>>> >> > organization on >>>> >> > github"? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Would I still be able to oversee the development process? In >>>> >> > particular, >>>> >> > accepting patches, nominating contributors etc... >>>> >> > How does that work? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Thank you. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 12:39 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Thanks Pieter. I've read all those things when I learned zmq :) I >>>> >> >> agree >>>> >> >> with what you're suggesting, but that model doesn't really work >>>> >> >> for me >>>> >> >> at >>>> >> >> this time. I was thinking of trying it this way for a year to see >>>> >> >> what >>>> >> >> happens in the future. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Elliot, thanks for that distinction. I've never thought about that >>>> >> >> but >>>> >> >> it >>>> >> >> makes perfect sense. >>>> >> >> Regarding curve, that would be amazing. This was going to be my >>>> >> >> next >>>> >> >> goal. >>>> >> >> You can contact me at [email protected] so we can discuss it >>>> >> >> further. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 5:10 a.m. Elliot Crosby-McCullough, >>>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Hi Andriy, >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Glad to see a full BEAM implementation. >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> I've been working on something similar in Elixir >>>> >> >>> (https://github.com/SmartCasual/elixir-zeromq) but since you've >>>> >> >>> gotten >>>> >> >>> further in Erlang I'll take a look at contributing Curve support >>>> >> >>> to >>>> >> >>> yours >>>> >> >>> instead, since all I really wanted was native BEAM instead of a >>>> >> >>> binding to >>>> >> >>> the C library given the dangers and/or inefficiencies of doing >>>> >> >>> so. >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> I'll have to look more closely into the licensing you've gone for >>>> >> >>> to >>>> >> >>> see >>>> >> >>> whether it's compatible with my needs. >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Small note, but what you've got there is an implementation not a >>>> >> >>> binding >>>> >> >>> (which is a good thing). It would be a binding if it used e.g. >>>> >> >>> the C >>>> >> >>> library to do the work. >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Regards, >>>> >> >>> Elliot >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> On 28 June 2016 at 18:09, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> >>>> >> >>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> At Pieter's suggestion, I am putting this here: >>>> >> >>>> https://github.com/chovencorp/erlangzmq >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Native erlang 18 implementation of ZMTP 3.1 (including resource >>>> >> >>>> property), but without any security. >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Hopefully it will be useful to people. I know I'll use it myself >>>> >> >>>> - >>>> >> >>>> since >>>> >> >>>> all (native) erlang bindings are out of date. >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> This is a six month young project, so this is NOT performance or >>>> >> >>>> otherwise tested at all, and I would appreciate any feedback >>>> >> >>>> (just >>>> >> >>>> take a >>>> >> >>>> second to file an issue). >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >> >>>> --Andriy Drozdyuk >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> >> >>>> [email protected] >>>> >> >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> >> >>> [email protected] >>>> >> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> >> > [email protected] >>>> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> >> [email protected] >>>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
