Hi, Peter. What did you mean by "bring the project into the ZeroMQ organization on github"?
Would I still be able to oversee the development process? In particular, accepting patches, nominating contributors etc... How does that work? Thank you. On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 12:39 Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Pieter. I've read all those things when I learned zmq :) I agree > with what you're suggesting, but that model doesn't really work for me at > this time. I was thinking of trying it this way for a year to see what > happens in the future. > > Elliot, thanks for that distinction. I've never thought about that but it > makes perfect sense. > Regarding curve, that would be amazing. This was going to be my next goal. > You can contact me at [email protected] so we can discuss it further. > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 5:10 a.m. Elliot Crosby-McCullough, < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Andriy, >> >> Glad to see a full BEAM implementation. >> >> I've been working on something similar in Elixir ( >> https://github.com/SmartCasual/elixir-zeromq) but since you've gotten >> further in Erlang I'll take a look at contributing Curve support to yours >> instead, since all I really wanted was native BEAM instead of a binding to >> the C library given the dangers and/or inefficiencies of doing so. >> >> I'll have to look more closely into the licensing you've gone for to see >> whether it's compatible with my needs. >> >> Small note, but what you've got there is an implementation not a binding >> (which is a good thing). It would be a binding if it used e.g. the C >> library to do the work. >> >> Regards, >> Elliot >> >> On 28 June 2016 at 18:09, Andriy Drozdyuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> At Pieter's suggestion, I am putting this here: >>> https://github.com/chovencorp/erlangzmq >>> >>> Native erlang 18 implementation of ZMTP 3.1 (including resource >>> property), but without any security. >>> >>> Hopefully it will be useful to people. I know I'll use it myself - since >>> all (native) erlang bindings are out of date. >>> >>> This is a six month young project, so this is NOT performance or >>> otherwise tested at all, and I would appreciate any feedback (just take a >>> second to file an issue). >>> >>> Thank you, >>> --Andriy Drozdyuk >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
