On Fri, Sep 11 at 16:15, Tim Cook wrote:
  The question wasn't about consumer vs. enterprise drives.  He said the SAS
  interface improves IOPS.  Please don't change the topic of discussion
  mid-thread.

Sorry, wasn't trying to derail, but most people don't make the
distinctions you do.

I think SATA actually has slightly lower protocol overhead than SAS,
and thus should be capable of slightly more IOPS if not limited
elsewhere.

--eric

--
Eric D. Mudama
edmud...@mail.bounceswoosh.org

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to