On Fri, Sep 11 at 16:15, Tim Cook wrote:
The question wasn't about consumer vs. enterprise drives. He said the SAS interface improves IOPS. Please don't change the topic of discussion mid-thread.
Sorry, wasn't trying to derail, but most people don't make the distinctions you do. I think SATA actually has slightly lower protocol overhead than SAS, and thus should be capable of slightly more IOPS if not limited elsewhere. --eric -- Eric D. Mudama edmud...@mail.bounceswoosh.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss