> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com] > > At some point, people will bitterly regret some "zpool upgrade" with no way > back. > > uhm... and how is that different than anything else in the software world? > > No attempt at backward compatibility, and no downgrade path, not even by > going back to an older snapshot before the upgrade. > > ZFS has a stellar record of backwards compatibility. The only break with > backwards > compatibility I can recall was a bug fix in the send stream somewhere around > opensolaris b34. > > Perhaps you are confusing backwards compatibility with forwards > compatibility?
Semantics. New version isn't compatible with old version, or old version isn't compatible with new version. Either way, same end result. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss