Stephen Beecroft wrote: --- You don't think she qualifies as "one actively engaged in conducting the business of a government"? You don't think she is "a person engaged in party politics as a profession"? I think she very clearly qualifies under at least those two definitions. ---
Yes, another tautology. Clearly she would considered a politician if she was involved in US politics. It would be laughable to argue that Ari Fleisher is not a politician. But admittedly, everything in Canada is strange and wonderful, unknowable by any but the most intrepid scientist, and with their primitive system of national government, the origins of which are lost in antiquity, it is feasible that other formal categorizations are more appropriate. Perhaps those engaging in Canadian politics are not necessarily politicians. Perhaps, for example, this woman might serve as a wholly apolitical appointee to the Royal House--in some office like the Royal Hereditary Grand Diaperer, or the King's Royal Food Taster. I can well imagine such a possibility. --- Mij Ebaboc ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
