Stephen Beecroft wrote:
You don't think she qualifies as "one actively engaged in conducting the
business of a government"? You don't think she is "a person engaged in
party politics as a profession"? I think she very clearly qualifies
under at least those two definitions.
Yes, another tautology.
Clearly she would considered a politician if she was involved in US
politics. It would be laughable to argue that Ari Fleisher is not a
But admittedly, everything in Canada is strange and wonderful,
unknowable by any but the most intrepid scientist, and with their
primitive system of national government, the origins of which are lost
in antiquity, it is feasible that other formal categorizations are more
appropriate. Perhaps those engaging in Canadian politics are not
necessarily politicians. Perhaps, for example, this woman might serve
as a wholly apolitical appointee to the Royal House--in some office like
the Royal Hereditary Grand Diaperer, or the King's Royal Food Taster.
I can well imagine such a possibility.
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: firstname.lastname@example.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!