Thomas Lotze wrote at 2008-2-12 11:09 +0100: > ... >> I don't think that's going to work here. Iterating through the >> transactions in the database for each iteration is going to be totally >> non-scalable. > >It seems to us that it would actually be the right thing to require that >storages have an efficient, scalable and stateless way of accessing their >transactions by ID. In the case of FileStorage, this might be achieved >using an index analogous to the one mapping object IDs to file positions.
How often do you need it? It is worse the additional index? Especially in view that a storage may contain a very large number of transactions? -- Dieter _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev